Tópicos em alta
#
Bonk Eco continues to show strength amid $USELESS rally
#
Pump.fun to raise $1B token sale, traders speculating on airdrop
#
Boop.Fun leading the way with a new launchpad on Solana.

No Limit Holdings
Empresa nativa de investimento em criptomoedas
A "única grande troca" não desapareceu tanto quanto mudou de mãos.
Se você olhar para ações puramente ativas da internet (Google, Meta, Amazon), a participação institucional agora está acima de 75%. Esse número dobrou na última década e triplicou em ~15 anos, e a ponderação combinada de S&P mudou de acordo.
O BTC hoje está em aproximadamente um único valor de mercado Mag-7, mas a participação institucional está mais próxima de 5% (e significativamente menor se você excluir ETFs). Em portfólios globais, isso representa ~0,25% de alocação contra uma base de $140T.
Se isso avançar, mesmo que seja ~2% nos próximos anos, que é o nível que grandes alocadores eventualmente alcançam em outros ativos de risco maduros, o fluxo se torna estrutural, e não guiado pela narrativa.
A situação é diferente para os alts. Quando o lance nativo de cripto não tem mais alts, a verdadeira questão é quem entra e por qual motivo. As instituições geralmente precisam de valor econômico duradouro e, atualmente, apenas alguns tokens geram mais de US$ 1 Bilhão em taxas anuais. Para a maioria, até US$ 100 milhões em taxas recorrentes seriam um limite para serem considerados investidos.

smac26 de nov. de 2025
as crypto matures and moves away from what it’s largely been since inception (i.e. “one big trade”)
it will not be enough to just be crypto native. that advantage quickly eroded already on the private side - this is obvious when looking at fund performance over time
it will be acutely felt on the liquid side as market structure shifts, especially when allocators are structurally designed to be long the asset class
imo you will very clearly need to have a much more holistic view on the world beyond crypto (some will suggest this means macro larping but imo it is more nuanced than this) and punting the question by saying “i don’t time markets” won’t fly if you are holding liquid tokens
nobody is expecting allocators to time markets perfectly but if we are entering a regime change where dispersion increases (we are) and the low-hanging fruit of aping anything in private markets has been picked (it has) then having no opinion on broader risk markets outside of crypto is unacceptable
i suspect in a few years we will see some truly horrendous performance from crypto-only firms despite many of the promises of the underlying technology being realized
in some respects this is already happening in the world of stablecoins. we all know that chart will continue to be up-only and yet, if you pull on the thread of where that value will ultimately accrue you hear some dubious conclusions
what’s maybe most interesting is that the world can now move quickly to first order effects thanks to AI and so participants will feel more informed (and probably are tbf) but then the questions are
1) do participants now feel a false sense of security (i.e. i now feel as if i am informed about this thing, when in fact i actually don’t know how it ~really~ works)
2) what are the second and third order effects of how the world will change (since understanding of first order effects are somewhat commoditized)
the latter is something we talk quite a bit about at compound, especially as we’ve historically spent more time treating research and primary source material as a first class citizen
the former is particularly intriguing to me because it reminds me a bit of @lightcrypto friend saying it’s not the things you don’t know that get you, it’s the things you think you know that just ain’t so
4,24K
Melhores
Classificação
Favoritos

