i am once again here to say agent discovery & registry hell is one of the least impactful things to focus on that for whatever reason keeps nerd sniping cracked ppl...most "mid" solutions for it are good enough and "better" solutions barely move the needle either you: 1) actually take your 'thought experiment' to its sci-fi logical conclusion wrt "autonomous" + "trustless" agents and make them a first class citizen by enshrining the {fdn model, tool use, etc.} components of an agent directly into the chain* (we do this) rather than frankensteining together some off-chain & on-chain stuff as mentioned in 8004 (we did this: infernet) 2) stay grounded in reality & grok how the largest b2b / b2b2c web2 agent startups (sierra, decagon, ...) that are printing real $$$ work. either they're in the camp of single general purpose agent deployed many times or a statically defined computational graph of how specialized agents communicate. this intellectual masturbatory notion of dynamic graphs of agents discovering each other much less useful than you may think if you're in the camp of web2 cos getting real users. if you're not in this camp, and believe in futuristic settings, then you should do 1). anything in between is worst of both worlds imo. *feel free to @ me but your fave L1 today (eth, solana, monad, ...) doesn't allow for enshrined agents. it's also highly non-trivial for them to do this given it's not in line with their fundamental design. expanding the exec clients' vm to handle fwd passes across oss llms, network calls for tool use, etc. is the easy part. hard part is bypassing replicated exec in consensus for non-deterministic behavior w/out ~degrading safety/liveness, fee mech, and how to allow for scheduled txs to exist in a way without borking the perf / end UX for regular txs. wouldn't be possible for us without the gigabrains @noamnisan @n_durvasula @bahrani_maryam and others coming up with some new machinery. reality is most L1s are an exercise in networking-bound settings...we're in an exec-bound one.

Aqui está o Digest do Ritual Research desta semana, um boletim informativo que cobre as últimas novidades no mundo dos LLMs e a interseção entre Crypto x AI. Com centenas de artigos publicados semanalmente, é impossível manter-se atualizado com o que há de mais recente. Nós faremos a leitura para que você não precise.

Uma implicação interessante deste trabalho é que tanto o staking *quanto* a realização de um leilão podem ser desnecessários para a aquisição de provas. As alocações em staking só superam a loteria quando impõem um grande ônus de colateral sobre os provadores, o que contradiz um mercado de provadores descentralizado.