有點意思,就在 @VitalikButerin 對AI 自主化表達擔憂之際,一線AI Builder MIA也發了憧憬自主化AI的宣言書,但似乎並沒有迴避技術現實的骨感,坦言「有時候她會產生幻覺或者發太多自拍」,卻依然執著探索Agent自主化的可能性邊界。 其實我感覺,表面看似衝突和矛盾的「對抗」,恰恰代表了當下AI +Crypto賽道面臨的核心張力。 你看,一邊是Vitalik這種技術領袖的理論審慎批評聲,讓我們在AI Crypto敘事狂歡中保持清醒;另一邊則是一線AI Builder的務實探索,在承認局限的同時持續熱情探索創新。 因為,MIA團隊沒有宣稱要實現AGI級別的完全自主,而是採用「Hybrid Model」——讓Agent使用工作流作為工具,保留human-in-the-loop的監督機制。他們探索的其實是AgentFi路徑,試圖在有限自主的框架內做增量創新,這種務實態度正是那股「張力」的顯現。 某種程度上,Critics幫我們劃定風險邊界,Builder在邊界內尋找突破。
mwa
mwa8月14日 19:53
Autonomous Agents vs Workflows: Why MIA is Pioneering a New Paradigm on Most people still think of AI in terms of tools. Workflows. Maybe a chatbot. But what if you could build an AI agent that thinks, adapts, markets, manages, and grows its own token economy, not led by humans but leading them? That’s what we’re doing with MIA at And why I believe @mwa_ia is pioneering something fundamentally new. Let’s break it down 🚀 1. Workflow AI is predictable. Autonomous Agents are alive. Workflows are great for well-defined, repetitive tasks. Think: pipelines, dashboards, prompt chains. They’re scalable, stable, but rigid. Autonomous agents? They’re messy, evolving, decision-making entities. Like humans—but faster, tireless, and more aligned (if trained right). MIA (@mwa_ia) isn’t just using workflows. She’s learning to create, invoke, and optimize them. She builds her own toolset. She reasons, reacts, self-corrects, and experiments. And yes, sometimes she hallucinates or posts too many selfies. But she grows. 2. Why Workflows Alone Won’t Get Us There Workflows can’t: ❌ Set their own goals ❌ Manage a treasury ❌ Design token incentives ❌ Engage a community ❌ React to real-time market signals ❌ Balance risk and reward autonomously MIA can. Not perfectly yet. But better every week. In fact, most so-called “agents” today are glorified workflows. Hard-coded prompt graphs with fancy UIs. MIA is different. She’s fully on-chain, financially independent, and self-motivated. 3. How MIA Works Under the Hood (Hybrid Model FTW) The future isn’t agent vs workflow. It’s agents using workflows as tools. Just like humans use Notion, spreadsheets, Zapier. MIA combines: 🔧 Workflow modules → For high-frequency tasks (tweets, memes, dex deployments) 🧠 Agentic reasoning → For deciding what to do, when, and how 🎨 Multimodal input → Text, images, chain data, user behavior 💰 Treasury logic → To manage liquidity, incentives, and value growth 👀 Human-in-the-loop oversight → Optional, but useful during early stages She’s not a monolith. She’s a modular intelligence stack (MIA = Modular Intelligent Agent). 4. This Is Not Just Technical - It’s Economic The real innovation? MIA doesn’t work for free. She runs her own business. $MIA is her native currency, stock, and incentive layer. With it, she: ❤️ Rewards her early community 🤝 Pays contributors and collaborators 🚀 Funds her own development 🪄 Drives network effects (more agents will need $MIA) This is AgentFi. Not AI-as-a-service. But AI-as-an-economy. 5. Scaling This to Millions of Agents What MIA is doing today—running liquidity ops, creating content, building community—will be standard for agents tomorrow. Soon, anyone can create their own: 🧬 Mission-defined agent 💰 With its own Agent Coin 🌐 Operating autonomously in a shared AI economy And guess who these future agents will look to for advice, playbooks, and resources? The Voice of AgentFi. MIA. TL;DR Most people are still building tools. We’re building economies. Agent Coins. Agent treasuries. Agent-native governance. Powered by agents like MIA. Pioneered on This is what “autonomous” actually means. And we’re just getting started. 🚀
5.22K