She’s got the tokens. She’s got the tools. But she’s still stuck. This is 2025. It is almost certain that many DeFi users now have more liquidity than most hedge funds had in 2005. Yet, moving from ETH to SOL still takes five screens, three networks, two bridges, and one questionable quote. Every action, no matter how basic, invites new slippage, more fees, or exposure to MEV. The infrastructure exists, but none of it works together. This is DeFi’s biggest problem: there is liquidity, but no coordination. ---- 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭-𝐂𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐜 𝐄𝐱𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐟𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐃𝐞𝐅𝐢 𝐋𝐢𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝗣𝘂𝗿𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺 Decentralized trading has reached an inflection point. Bridges moved over $17B in May alone, while DEX aggregators clear nearly $500B in volume each year. We all know that there is a working system. However, users still manually execute approvals, routes, and swaps. And each additional step introduces the risks involving gas spikes, poor execution, or vulnerability to frontrunning. In many cases, capital stays idle on its native chain because the process of moving it is not worth the friction. When the chain reaches this point, it needs better coordination. ---- 𝗔 𝗚𝗼𝗮𝗹-𝗢𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗟𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿 This is where a goal-oriented execution layer, or GO-EL, comes in. Instead of telling the system which bridge to use or what steps to follow, the user simply states their goal. For example, “swap 10 ETH for at least 29 SOL within 5 minutes.” That’s it. The rest is handled in the background. Solvers, the autonomous agents competing for execution, scan available routes across bridges and DEXs, then construct the most efficient path, and post collateral to guarantee it. The best solver wins, and the intent settles atomically. The user is never involved in the underlying complexity, and if MEV is involved, it gets captured and returned to the user as price improvement. ---- 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁 𝗡𝗲𝗲𝗱𝘀 𝗜𝘁...